Technology

Node.js development services for TypeScript backends

Node.js lets product teams use one language, TypeScript, across the front end and backend. We use it for APIs, backends-for-frontends, real-time features and serverless functions, and we are open about where a JVM backend is the better choice.

Where Node.js fits well

Node.js runs JavaScript on an event loop with non-blocking I/O, which makes it efficient for services that spend most of their time waiting on databases, other APIs or network connections. It is a natural fit for APIs serving web and mobile clients, real-time features over WebSockets, and lightweight services that glue other systems together.

Its biggest practical advantage is shared TypeScript across the stack. Types, validation schemas and API clients can be shared between a React front end and the backend, which removes a whole class of integration bugs and lets smaller teams move faster.

Node.js or Java: an honest comparison

Node.js is a poor fit for CPU-heavy work such as large data transformations, image processing or complex calculations, because long-running computation blocks the event loop for every request. Worker threads help, but at that point a JVM or Go service is often simpler.

For large domains with complex transactional logic and long expected lifetimes, we often recommend Java with Spring Boot instead: the type system, tooling and runtime profiling are more mature for that kind of system. Many architectures combine both, using Node.js for backends-for-frontends and Java for core domain services.

How we build Node.js backends

We write Node.js services in strict TypeScript on current LTS releases. For larger applications we use NestJS, whose modules and dependency injection give a clear structure that scales across teams; for small, performance-sensitive services we use Fastify. Inputs are validated at the edge with schemas, and the same schemas generate OpenAPI documentation.

Data access goes through typed query builders or ORMs such as Prisma or Drizzle, with explicit migrations. Long-running or retryable work is moved to queues instead of request handlers. Every service ships with structured logging, health checks, OpenTelemetry tracing and graceful shutdown so it behaves correctly in containers.

  • Strict TypeScript, ESLint and type checks enforced in CI
  • Unit tests with Vitest, API tests against real databases using Testcontainers
  • Background jobs with BullMQ or cloud-native queues instead of in-process timers
  • Dependency auditing and lockfile hygiene to reduce supply-chain risk

Backends-for-frontends and serverless

A backend-for-frontend (BFF) is a thin service shaped around one client, such as a web app or a mobile app. It aggregates calls to underlying services, handles session and authentication concerns and returns exactly the data the interface needs. Node.js is well suited to this role because it can share types directly with the client.

For spiky or event-driven workloads we deploy Node.js on AWS Lambda or Azure Functions, keeping cold starts low through small bundles and minimal dependencies. Infrastructure is defined as code as part of our cloud and DevOps services.

Taking over an existing Node.js codebase

Node.js projects tend to age quickly: unmaintained packages, callback-era code, missing types and inconsistent error handling. We start with a dependency and security audit, add tests around critical endpoints, then migrate to TypeScript and current Node.js LTS versions incrementally. If the service has outgrown its original design, we approach the restructuring as part of our backend and API engineering.

Use cases

What we build with Node.js

  • 01

    APIs for web and mobile applications

    REST and GraphQL APIs in TypeScript, sharing types and validation with the client applications that consume them.

  • 02

    Backends-for-frontends

    Client-specific services that aggregate several backends and keep front-end code simple and fast.

  • 03

    Real-time features

    Notifications, collaboration and live dashboards over WebSockets or server-sent events.

  • 04

    Serverless and event-driven functions

    Lambda or Azure Functions handlers for webhooks, scheduled jobs and queue processing, defined as code.

Ecosystem

Tools we use alongside Node.js

  • Node.js LTS
  • TypeScript
  • NestJS
  • Fastify
  • Express
  • Prisma
  • Drizzle ORM
  • BullMQ
  • Vitest
  • OpenTelemetry
  • AWS Lambda

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Node.js suitable for enterprise applications?

Yes, for the right workloads: I/O-heavy APIs, BFFs and integration services. With strict TypeScript, a structured framework like NestJS and proper testing, Node.js codebases can be as maintainable as any other. For CPU-intensive processing or very complex transactional domains, we usually recommend a JVM service alongside it.

Should we choose NestJS, Fastify or Express?

NestJS suits larger applications and teams that benefit from a consistent, opinionated structure. Fastify is a good choice for small, fast services. Express remains common in existing codebases, and we maintain it, but we rarely choose it for new projects.

Can you migrate our JavaScript backend to TypeScript?

Yes. We enable TypeScript alongside existing JavaScript and convert the codebase file by file, starting with the most critical modules, so delivery continues during the migration.

Can Node.js and Java services work together in one system?

Yes, and it is a common pattern. Services communicate through well-defined APIs or message brokers, so each can use the runtime that suits it. Read more about our approach on the Java development page.

Have a project in mind?

Let's build something exceptional.

Tell us where you are and where you want to go. We'll reply within one business day with honest next steps, even if that means pointing you elsewhere.